Affordable ivf in IndiaIVF and related assisted reproductive technologies (ART) provide great hope to infertile couples the world over. as a result of these techniques are thus costly, however, they’re out of the reach of the vast majority of couples - and particularly of these within the developing world. This can be as a result of IVF programs are too technology-intensive at the moment - and something that is sophisticated is bound to be pricy.
A hi-tech approach is very harmful within the developing world, wherever doctors typically blindly duplicate what foreign IVF programs do. They imitate the Western ideal that’s thus tempting with its subtle equipment - ‘never mind the cost’. If this approach were undefeated, then there would be very little to criticize, however it will never be practical as a result of the infrastructure to support such refined services is just not offered within the developing world. Thus, for instance, it’s straightforward to buy an imported carbon dioxide incubator or a reverse-osmosis water-preparation system - however with simply no maintenance and after-sales services to keep them functioning properly the result is that these systems usually become white elephants.
IVF has developed in 2 completely different directions nowadays. One is that the high-tech approach, which has such exciting techniques like microinjection, pre-implantation genetic diagnosing, and embryo co-cultures. These’ second generation IVF procedures’ are terribly overpriced and labor- intensive, however; they’re applicable to few patients; and whereas worthy in advanced IVF laboratories within the West, aren’t relevant within the developing world, wherever the essential goal of an IVF clinic service to infertile patients.
The other direction within which IVF is evolving is towards simplification. whereas it’s true that these ’ simplified IVF techniques’ don’t thus far provide pretty much as good a pregnancy rate as typical IVF, they’re rather more relevant within the developing world. What have these simplifications been?
Source: Tumblr
A hi-tech approach is very harmful within the developing world, wherever doctors typically blindly duplicate what foreign IVF programs do. They imitate the Western ideal that’s thus tempting with its subtle equipment - ‘never mind the cost’. If this approach were undefeated, then there would be very little to criticize, however it will never be practical as a result of the infrastructure to support such refined services is just not offered within the developing world. Thus, for instance, it’s straightforward to buy an imported carbon dioxide incubator or a reverse-osmosis water-preparation system - however with simply no maintenance and after-sales services to keep them functioning properly the result is that these systems usually become white elephants.
IVF has developed in 2 completely different directions nowadays. One is that the high-tech approach, which has such exciting techniques like microinjection, pre-implantation genetic diagnosing, and embryo co-cultures. These’ second generation IVF procedures’ are terribly overpriced and labor- intensive, however; they’re applicable to few patients; and whereas worthy in advanced IVF laboratories within the West, aren’t relevant within the developing world, wherever the essential goal of an IVF clinic service to infertile patients.
The other direction within which IVF is evolving is towards simplification. whereas it’s true that these ’ simplified IVF techniques’ don’t thus far provide pretty much as good a pregnancy rate as typical IVF, they’re rather more relevant within the developing world. What have these simplifications been?
Source: Tumblr